I'm encountering an intermittent bug in my Java application that processes large datasets using multiple threads. It seems to be a race condition, but I'm struggling to pinpoint the exact cause and implement a robust solution. Sometimes, a record is processed twice, or completely skipped, even with what I believed were proper synchronization mechanisms.
Here's a simplified code snippet demonstrating the core logic:
public class DataProcessor {
private List<String> sharedQueue = new Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList<>());
I'm encountering an intermittent bug in my Java application that processes large datasets using multiple threads. It seems to be a race condition, but I'm struggling to pinpoint the exact cause and implement a robust solution. Sometimes, a record is processed twice, or completely skipped, even with what I believed were proper synchronization mechanisms.
Here's a simplified code snippet demonstrating the core logic:
public class DataProcessor {
private List<String> sharedQueue = new Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList<>());
private Set<String> processedItems = Collections.synchronizedSet(new HashSet<>()); // To track processed items
public void addItem(String item) {
sharedQueue.add(item);
}
public void processData() {
// Assume multiple worker threads call this concurrently
while (!sharedQueue.isEmpty()) {
String data = null;
synchronized (sharedQueue) { // Synchronize on sharedQueue
if (!sharedQueue.isEmpty()) {
data = sharedQueue.remove(0);
}
}
if (data != null) {
if (!processedItems.contains(data)) { // Check if already processed
// Simulate complex processing
try {
Thread.sleep(50); // Simulate some work
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}
System.out.println("Processing: " + data);
processedItems.add(data);
} else {
System.out.println("Skipping already processed: " + data);
}
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
DataProcessor processor = new DataProcessor();
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
processor.addItem("Item_" + i);
}
// Create and start multiple worker threads
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
new Thread(processor::processData).start();
}
}
}